Categories
Small Business Funding

Senate GOP responds to governor’s State of the State address for 2025 legislative session [Video]

Video above: Senate Republican Leader Bill Sharer, Whip Pat Woods and Caucus Chair David Gallegos responded to Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s State of the State address on Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2025. They also outlined their priorities for the 2025 legislative session. The first day of the 60-day session began at New Mexico State Capitol on Tuesday. Follow up questions to the presser is below.WATCH: Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham delivers 2025 State of the State address “We’re here to talk about what the governor just talked about. So, first of all, I want to acknowledge the public safety issue. Certainly, statewide everybody knows we have a public safety issue, but we also need a meaningful way to address this stuff, and I’m not sure we got there today,” Sharer stated during Tuesday’s news conference. “She did acknowledge we have serious crime problem, but she more focused on behavioral health than on what the real crime was. We, as Republicans, have been talking about real crime solutions for a long time. In fact, during the special session, we actually supported real crime solutions, while her own party completely abandoned it,” Sharer said.Related: New Mexico Senate and House adjourn for 2024 special session”We’re here to make sure we can do the real work that needs to be done. It’s paramount that we collaborate with the governor on this, but we also need her to collaborate with us to make sure we’re making real solutions,” Sharer added. “We must think more about how we stop random violent crime, drug trafficking, retail crime, auto thefts, or the rest of us will continue to pay. It’s time to talk about putting more criminals into jail and quit the revolving door,” State Senator Pat Woods said. “The Children’s Youth & Families Department she acknowledged this is a real problem. We’re not protecting our children, so her solution was to create another government program. When I think of government programs of what’s failing us, so we need something else, we need to figure out what’s going on at CYFD, and I think we do know what’s going on and put our effort into protecting the children,” Woods said during Tuesday’s news conference. Faith Egbuonu: You guys stated that you all have common-sense solutions that have been rejected from the other side. I ask the specifics of that. You guys also stated you need a meaningful way to address these issues and you guys aren’t sure you got there today with the governor’s State of the State address. The governor stated in her speech that they plan to fully fund CYFD Moving the responsibility of CARA, a program that helps families whose children have been exposed to drug and alcohol use in the womb to the Department of Health. What do you guys’ plan to do?Sharer: So, you talked about commonsense for crime Egbuonu: Yes, that you guys said was rejected from the other side, so I’m curious to know.Sharer: Well, we offered a variety of these things over time, but one of them is the catch and the release. How do you stop the catch and release? Well, we can. Our judges can, but if our judges aren’t going to do it by themselves, certainly, through statute, we can keep violent and repeated offenders off the streets. The governor said so, but for years, we haven’t tried to do anything legislatively. It wasn’t shot down in the first committee. Our bills were shot down in the first committee. The catch-and-release is a huge one because that brings us to the certainty of punishment and the certainty of the punishment is really the deterrent, that’s commonsense.Sharer: As far as fully funding CYFD, I don’t remember exactly what they are in the budget, but fully funded; come on, our budget has increased 70 percent since she became the governor. Do we have 70 percent less crime? Do we have 70 percent more children at can read? Do we have 70 percent better outcomes at CYFD? We’re fully funded. We’re not fully organized and using it. Egbuonu: Were you guys in support of the bill, because it’s been modified for years and still nothing is being done about it but increasing prison time for convicted felons in possession of a handgun, did you guys back that as well? Because I know that’s something the governor proposed, and we got nowhere with the special session. Sharer: In the special session, yes, Senator Morres, Republican, carried that bill. In fact, only republicans carried her crime bills.Republican Party of New Mexico statement”While we acknowledge the governors sentiment that New Mexicans deserve better, her same approach of throwing more money at the many issues in our state has not produced results. Over her 6-year tenure, the state budget has increased by approximately 73%, yet critical areas like education and child welfare remain last in the nation. We have yet to see substantial progress in The Children, Youth, and Families Department (CYFD).While the governor briefly acknowledged the record oil and gas revenues, she once again failed to thank the oil and gas industry for contributing nearly half of our state’s budget while proposing legislation that threatens to eliminate this vital sector by 2050.She introduced the idea of a tax credit for businesses to combat crime, but she ignored the Paid Family Leave Act, which would force many small businesses to close or relocate out of state.We appreciate the governor’s recognition of the crime crisis plaguing our cities. She mentioned some “common sense” policies like reforming the competency laws to keep repeat offenders behind bars, but what she didn’t mention is that these are also Republican policies that Democrats have repeatedly killed year after year. We are hopeful that the governor and the progressive Democrats in the legislature will finally back these critical pieces of legislation this year.Immigration, a critical issue for New Mexico as a border state, was notably absent from her speech. New Mexico cannot continue to be a hub for those exploiting our open borders to bring crime and deadly drugs like fentanyl into our communities.We urge the Democrats in the legislature to prioritize the issues that matter to New Mexicans this year. The Republican Party of New Mexico remains committed keeping our citizens informed about their legislators’ votes throughout this session.” Chair Amy BarelaStay updated on the latest news updates with the KOAT app. You can download it here.

Categories
Small Business Funding

New Mexico and 21 states sue over executive order ending birthright citizenship [Video]

Attorney General Raul Torrez joined 17 states and two cities in a lawsuit against an executive order ending birthright citizenship Tuesday afternoon. Four other states filed a similar lawsuit, asking the federal court to keep the executive order from being implemented or enforced. According to the executive order’s title, it’s designed to “Protect the meaning and value of American citizenship.” However, Torrez and other attorneys general said it’s their duty to protect all American citizens’ constitutional rights. “They deserve the same right as everyone else to prove their loyalty as citizens. There’s no such thing in this country as a birthright citizen; they’re just citizens, and they need to be treated that way,” said Torrez. “The Supreme Court’s actually interpreted this aspect of the constitution and has said unequivocally that children born in this country are entitled to all the rights and privileges as every other citizen of this country.”The president’s executive order challenges how the 14th amendment has been applied since it was ratified after the civil war, saying it has been misinterpreted. Starting on February 19, thirty days since the president signed the order, babies who are born in the U.S. are not automatically given citizenship if their parents are unlawfully living in the U.S. This also applies if either parent is here lawfully but staying temporarily on something such as a student, work or tourist visa. “This executive order is meant more to instill fear in communities than anything else. I think the Trump administration knows that they’re not on solid legal footing here,” said Sophia Genovese, the managing attorney at the New Mexico Immigrant Law Center. Genovese said this is a distraction from the real issues Americans face. “Immigrants aren’t taking people’s housing. Immigrants aren’t taking medical care. Immigrants aren’t causing inflation. But immigrants are constantly blamed for underlying societal problems that Congress and the executive refused to take action on,” said Genovese. Torrez is waiting for a federal judge to grant a preliminary injunction. Stay updated on the latest from the Roundhouse in Santa Fe and from Washington with updates on the KOAT app. You can download it here.

Categories
Small Business Funding

Trump’s executive order dismantles federal diversity programs [Video]

President Donald Trump’s administration is directing that all federal diversity, equity and inclusion staff be put on paid leave, and that agencies develop plans to lay them off, according to a memo Tuesday from the Office of Personnel Management.The memo follows an executive order Trump signed on his first day ordering a sweeping dismantling of the federal governments diversity and inclusion programs that could touch on everything from anti-bias training to funding for minority farmers and homeowners.The memo directs agencies to place DEI office staffers on paid leave by 5 p.m. Wednesday and take down all public DEI-focused webpages by the same deadline. Several federal departments had removed the webpages even before the memorandum. Agencies must also cancel any DEI-related trainings and end any related contracts, and federal workers are being asked to report to Trump’s Office of Personnel Management if they suspect any DEI-related program has been renamed to obfuscate its purpose within 10 days or face adverse consequences.By Thursday, federal agencies are directed to compile a list of federal DEI offices and workers as of Election Day. By next Friday, they are expected to develop a list to execute a reduction-in-force action against those federal workers.The memo was first reported by CBS News.The move comes after Monday’s executive order accused former President Joe Biden of forcing discrimination programs into virtually all aspects of the federal government through diversity, equity and inclusion programs, known as DEI.That step is the first salvo in an aggressive campaign to upend DEI efforts nationwide, including leveraging the Justice Department and other agencies to investigate private companies pursuing training and hiring practices that conservative critics consider discriminatory against non-minority groups such as white men.The executive order picks up where Trump’s first administration left off: One of Trumps final acts during his first term was an executive order banning federal agency contractors and recipients of federal funding from conducting anti-bias training that addressed concepts like systemic racism. Biden promptly rescinded that order on his first day in office and issued a pair of executive orders now rescinded outlining a plan to promote DEI throughout the federal government.While many changes may take months or even years to implement, Trumps new anti-DEI agenda is more aggressive than his first and comes amid far more amenable terrain in the corporate world. Prominent companies from Walmart to Facebook have already scaled back or ended some of their diversity practices in response to Trump’s election and conservative-backed lawsuits against them.Here’s a look at some of the policies and programs that Trump will aim to dismantle:Diversity offices, training and accountabilityTrump’s order will immediately gut Biden’s wide-ranging effort to embed diversity and inclusion practices in the federal workforce, the nation’s largest at about 2.4 million people.Biden had mandated all agencies to develop a diversity plan, issue yearly progress reports, and contribute data for a government-wide dashboard to track demographic trends in hiring and promotions. The administration also set up a Chief Diversity Officers Council to oversee the implementation of the DEI plan. The government released its first DEI progress report in 2022 that included demographic data for the federal workforce, which is about 60% white and 55% male overall, and more than 75% white and more than 60% male at the senior executive level.Trump’s executive order will toss out equity plans developed by federal agencies and terminate any roles or offices dedicated to promoting diversity. It will include eliminating initiatives such as DEI-related training or diversity goals in performance reviews.Federal grant and benefits programsTrump’s order paves the way for an aggressive but bureaucratically complicated overhaul of billions of dollars in federal spending that conservative activists claim unfairly carve out preference for racial minorities and women.The order does not specify which programs it will target but mandates a government-wide review to ensure that contracts and grants are compliant with the Trump administrations anti-DEI stance. It also proposes that the federal government settle ongoing lawsuits against federal programs that benefit historically underserved communities, including some that date back decades.Trumps executive order is a seismic shift and a complete change in the focus and direction of the federal government, said Dan Lennington, deputy council for the conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, which has pursued several lawsuits against federal programs. The institute recently released an influential report listing dozens of programs the Trump administration should consider dismantling, such as credits for minority farmers or emergency relief assistance for majority-Black neighborhoods.He acknowledged that unwinding some entrenched programs may be difficult. For example, the Treasury Department implements housing and other assistance programs through block grants to states that have their own methods for implementing diversity criteria.Pay equity and hiring practicesIt’s not clear whether the Trump administration will target every initiative that stemmed from Biden’s DEI executive order.For example, the Biden administration banned federal agencies from asking about an applicant’s salary history when setting compensation, a practice many civil rights activists say perpetuates pay disparities for women and people of color.It took three years for the Biden administration to issue the final regulations, and Trump would have to embark on a similar rule-making process, including a notice and comment period, to rescind it, said Chiraag Bains, former deputy director of the White House Domestic Policy Council under Biden and now a nonresident senior fellow with Brookings Metro.Noreen Farrell, executive director of gender rights group Equal Rights Advocates, said that she was hopeful that the Trump administration will not go out of its way to undo the rule, which she said has proved popular in some state and cities that have enacted similar policies.And Biden’s DEI plan encompassed some initiatives with bipartisan support, said Bains. For example, he tasked the Chief Diversity Officers Executive Council with expanding federal employment opportunities for those with criminal records. That initiative stems from the Fair Chance Act, which Trump signed into law in 2019 and bans federal agencies and contractors from asking about an applicants criminal history before a conditional job offer is made.Bains said that’s what Biden’s DEI policies were about: ensuring that the federal government was structured to include historically marginalized communities, not institute reverse discrimination against white men.Despite the sweeping language of Trump’s order, Farrell said, the reality of implementing such massive structural changes is far more complex.”Federal agencies have deeply embedded policies and procedures that cant simply be switched off overnight, she added.